Gentleman, I've asked this question on several different occasions in different threads and I've net gotten an answer. Does anyone know what the "legal" procedure is to remove the president in Iran? Can it be done both by Supreme Nacho and the Parliament and what are the steps for each one? How was Bani Sadr removed?

Mr, G.

Section 10 of Artilcle 110 of IRI constitution describes the the authority of Rahkahr regrading Prez.

10.Dismissal of the' President of the Republic, with due regard for the interests of the country, after the Supreme Court holds him guilty of the violation of his constitutional duties, or after a vote of the Islamic Consultative Assembly testifying to his incompetence on the basis of Article 89 of the Constitution

And section 2 of Article 89 indicates the authority and the process in which Parliament can proceed with the impeachment and/or dismissal of the Prez:

Article 89,

2.In the event at least one-third of the members of the Islamic Consultative Assembly interpolate the President concerning his executive responsibilities in relation with the Executive Power and the executive affairs of the country, the President must be present in the Assembly within one month after the tabling of the interpolation in order to give adequate explanations in regard to the matters raised. In the event, after hearing the statements of the opposing and favoring members and the reply of the President, two-thirds of the members of the Assembly declare a vote of no confidence, the same will be communicated to the Leadership for information and implementation of Section (10) of Article 110 of the Constitution.

Hope this helps.;)

Thanks Rasoul jaan, it does. So, if I'm understanding this correctly, there's no way that the Parliament would be able to remove AN before 22nd of Bahman (because of the one month clause). But there's also the clause for the "Supreme Court". What is that and what does it entail?

Thanks Rasoul jaan, it does. So, if I'm understanding this correctly, there's no way that the Parliament would be able to remove AN before 22nd of Bahman (because of the one month clause). But there's also the clause for the "Supreme Court". What is that and what does it entail?
Mr, G.

With the invention of Guardian Council and magnitude of authority bestowed to this entity I.S Supreme Court is nothing but just a name to depict IRI as a modern civilized Gov.
IRI Supreme Court is nothing, probably that is why you never hear from them at all. Here is Article 161 describing the authority and responsibilities of S.C: (vague as repenting old whore)

Article 161
The Supreme Court is to be formed for the purpose of supervising the correct implementation of the laws by the courts, ensuring uniformity of judicial procedure, and fulfilling any other responsibilities assigned to it by law, on the basis of regulations to be established by the head of the judicial branch.

Thanks again Rasoul jaan. It's basicallt like the Canadian or US supreme court. I don't know why it didn't click in, but all this rupremacy going around (suprme leader, supreme court, etc.) I thought it means simething else. The jist of all this is that contrary to EA's assessment (the plit against AN), there's no way in hell this could be done before the 22nd of Bahman, although a symbolic 1/3 vote in the parliament could be a possibility.

Forget the process Behrou jan, there is no such thing called "process" within I.S.
If/when they decide to impeach the monkey that would be the clearest indication that the mofo's are running out of option and they have pretty much playing their last card.

I don't think we'll see that happen as AN's faith is intertwined with so many Sepah MF's that they would not compremise....they will keep AN until the whole I.S. sinks in that god-damn stinking well in Qom. ;)

Thanks again Rasoul jaan. It's basicallt like the Canadian or US supreme court. I don't know why it didn't click in, but all this rupremacy going around (suprme leader, supreme court, etc.) I thought it means simething else. The jist of all this is that contrary to EA's assessment (the plit against AN), there's no way in hell this could be done before the 22nd of Bahman, although a symbolic 1/3 vote in the parliament could be a possibility.
Mr, G.
I don't know about Canadian S.C, on the contrary US.SC have always been pretty BZ taking care of the business and always maintain the authority of the highest "say" in the nation's affair and rule of law.
IMHO US could never survive for so long if US.SC didn't look after it, other wise people in Washington whom all we know would tear it apart.

If the IS wants to remove AN, they won't use any clause in the constitution, they use the fast track: Put him on an all safe Topolov airplane or a very well maintained Helicopter. :looti:

If the IS wants to remove AN, they won't use any clause in the constitution, they use the fast track: Put him on an all safe Topolov airplane or a very well maintained Helicopter. :looti:

Yes. This is the likely senario if they run out of options. They will just make a shahid out of AN through some assasination or some otherway. Maybe even "package" the whole thing by throwing in Shamaye or couple of other AN's close buddies in "kill one get one free" deal. :Ban-Cha:

"kill one get one free" deal. :Ban-Cha:

ROFL. How do you come up with this stuff?! :bow2:

Or an Evil monkey fight to the death?
423424