View Full Version : Imagine no news on nukes


alimostofi
05-07-2010, 10:16 PM
Imagine, if you can, that we did not have any news on nukes, for a while. It would mean that the Islamic regime would suddenly look vulnerable. Vulnerable seems like a strong word, but it is appropriate.

We live in a world controlled by the media. The Islamic regime, is around because it does a great job of media theatrics. It plays all sort of false xenophobic games for a variety of commentators. The commentators in return make a lot of money on either sides of the nuclear debate.

So who is at fault? Is it the media, or the mullahs?

alimostofi
05-07-2010, 10:39 PM
"By God's grace, Iran has entered the world countries' nuclear club," said in a sermon broadcast live on state radio.

http://arabnews.com/middleeast/article51098.ece

Motori
05-08-2010, 03:49 PM
This high ranking clerical they are reporting from is the same person who claimed promiscuous women cause earthquakes.

Iran is years away to come up with a testable device even then the detonation mechanism will be another challenge which Iran is not capable of making it on her own, unless they buy it from Pakistan or PDRK.

Even after successful testing the question of reliable delivery system still stands, unlless barbaric republic thinks a 747 could do the job for them.:D

alimostofi
05-09-2010, 10:50 AM
This high ranking clerical they are reporting from is the same person who claimed promiscuous women cause earthquakes.

Iran is years away to come up with a testable device even then the detonation mechanism will be another challenge which Iran is not capable of making it on her own, unless they buy it from Pakistan or PDRK.

Even after successful testing the question of reliable delivery system still stands, unlless barbaric republic thinks a 747 could do the job for them.:D

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

Joseph Goebbels said that. So the real question is, what is the machinery that they use for propaganda? Change that, and the State is stuck. Khomeini used Cassettes. We use Twitter etc. Iranians are the largest Bloggers for this reason.

keyvan_pars
05-10-2010, 10:45 AM
The Shi-i-t-e empire are exponentiating their efforts towards achieving nuclear weapons.

This will make them into a new Pakistan, which, cannot be touched no matter what they impose on their own people and the neighboring countries.

alimostofi
05-10-2010, 11:17 AM
The Shi-i-t-e empire are exponentiating their efforts towards achieving nuclear weapons.

This will make them into a new Pakistan, which, cannot be touched no matter what they impose on their own people and the neighboring countries.

Ba Dorood kp

Non-violent general strikes can change regimes. The reason it has not happened, is that the people have no non-violent relationships to make a movement. Like us in the opposition and in Iran, the people cannot create a massive non-violent movement.
:console: the people need a lot of consoling

keyvan_pars
05-10-2010, 01:36 PM
what that has got to do with the topic you opened, the nukes ????

alimostofi
05-10-2010, 02:03 PM
what that has got to do with the topic you opened, the nukes ????

A lot. No nukes, means more money to spend elsewhere. If Iran did not have Ayatollahs who are spending even more than the Shah, on the military, instead of social programs, then Iran would be an economic giant, and an economic threat to the West. The mullahs are doing a great job in wasting money.

keyvan_pars
05-10-2010, 04:34 PM
A lot. No nukes, means more money to spend elsewhere. If Iran did not have Ayatollahs who are spending even more than the Shah, on the military, instead of social programs, then Iran would be an economic giant, and an economic threat to the West. The mullahs are doing a great job in wasting money.

nothing wrong with spending on military. specially in that ZOO part of the world. The problem with these scumbags, however, is that they are foreigners and have absolutely no aim to help iranians excel in any aspect of life.

they are here to steal iranian oil money and leave the country impovrished at every level.

alimostofi
05-10-2010, 04:41 PM
nothing wrong with spending on military. specially in that ZOO part of the world. The problem with these scumbags, however, is that they are foreigners and have absolutely no aim to help iranians excel in any aspect of life.

they are here to steal iranian oil money and leave the country impovrished at every level.

Ideologically I am against the military industrial complex. Some countries like the US, they need wars to keep their economy going, because it is such a large component. PRK are even worse, with their Stalinist system. The IRGC want to the same in Iran. The last thing they want, is a consumer based economy, being run by a healthy modern private sector. Ironically the Shah's Generals were the same.

keyvan_pars
05-10-2010, 04:47 PM
Ideologically I am against the military industrial complex. Some countries like the US, they need wars to keep their economy going, because it is such a large component. PRK are even worse, with their Stalinist system. The IRGC want to the same in Iran. The last thing they want, is a consumer based economy, being run by a healthy modern private sector. Ironically the Shah's Generals were the same.

whatever shah's generals were they kept the dirty hands of savages off our soil. well the external savages anyway.

and during the 37 years of their reign we didn't have 1.5 million iranian BY FOREIGN ARMIES.

so if you preach non-violence please start by preaching non-violence against your own people first.

Motori
05-10-2010, 04:47 PM
A lot. No nukes, means more money to spend elsewhere. If Iran did not have Ayatollahs who are spending even more than the Shah, on the military, instead of social programs, then Iran would be an economic giant, and an economic threat to the West. The mullahs are doing a great job in wasting money.

nothing wrong with spending on military. specially in that ZOO part of the world. The problem with these scumbags, however, is that they are foreigners and have absolutely no aim to help iranians excel in any aspect of life.

they are here to steal iranian oil money and leave the country impovrished at every level.
IMHO You both are saying the same thing with different tone.:D

alimostofi
05-10-2010, 04:50 PM
motori: tones, yes that does make us different

kp: I do not understand this sentence, "and during the 37 years of their reign we didn't have 1.5 million iranian BY FOREIGN ARMIES."

keyvan_pars
05-10-2010, 06:41 PM
sorry was doing five things at the same time

1.5 million KILLED ...

like the old british game show blankety blank